top of page

Odour Control In Rubber Industry | Odoserve 

Amalgam Blog Image-04-min (1).jpg

Rubber manufacturing processes often produce strong, unpleasant smells that can lead to community complaints and regulatory fines. For example, the distinctive burning rubber odour comes from sulphur compounds (like mercaptans and H₂S) and various organic solvents released during production. In many rubber and plastics plants, a complex mix of VOCs (volatile organic compounds) and other chemicals is exhausted into the air. Addressing these odours is essential to protect worker health (preventing headaches or nausea) and to avoid pollution penalties. Reducing VOC emissions can prevent regulatory fines and improve a plant’s reputation.

Sources of Odour in Rubber Manufacturing

​Several steps in rubber production generate odours:
 

  • Vulcanization: Heating rubber with sulfur releases gases like hydrogen sulfide (rotten-egg smell) and mercaptans.

  • Compounding/Mixing: Adding oils, resins and accelerators can emit VOC solvents (benzene, toluene, styrene, etc.).

  • Extrusion & Heating: Processing at high temperatures liberates hydrocarbons, ammonia, and organic acids.

  • Wastewater and Storage: Even wastewater lagoons and waste rubber produce odors (ammonia, H₂S, methane) as organic materials break down.


Because rubber formulas and raw materials vary, the exact smell can change from batch to batch. Inconsistent odor profiles make it hard to predict and control emissions with a single solution.

Key Challenges in Rubber Odour Control

Rubber plants face many technical hurdles when trying to scrub smells:
 

  • Complex VOC Emissions: The exhaust can contain dozens of different odorous compounds. For example, one study identified ~80 VOC species in rubber drying emissions, many of which had strong odors. This chemical diversity means conventional scrubbers often catch only the most obvious pollutants, leaving some odours untreated.
     

  • High-Temperature Exhausts: Processes like curing ovens or extruders exhaust very hot gas. Many odour-control chemicals or biofilters degrade at these temperatures, reducing effectiveness. (Special insulation or cooling may be needed.)
     

  • Variable Odour Profile: Switching raw materials or formulas can introduce new odour-causing agents. A system tuned for one chemical (say, a solvent) might not catch new smells from a different additive.
     

  • Inefficient Wet Scrubbers: Standard wet scrubbers force exhaust through a liquid to capture gases, but research has shown they often fail to remove the most potent rubber odours. In fact, one paper notes “poor performance of wet scrubbers” caused lingering odours in a rubber plant study. In practice, ammonia and sulfur compounds frequently pass through scrubbers.
     

  • Generic One-Size Solutions: Simply installing a single filter or scrubber rarely solves all issues. For example, a scrubber designed for acid gases won’t stop volatile organic smells, and activated carbon beds may not trap hydrogen sulfide efficiently. If mercaptans or amines are the culprit, they need specific neutralizers.
     

  • Poor Airflow Design: Even the best scrubber fails if the ductwork is leaky or undirected. Exhaust hoods must cover every odour source; otherwise smells “escape” before treatment. Many older plants lack fully-sealed ventilation, leading to fugitive odours.

    These technical problems are compounded by practical and environmental concerns:
     

  • High Energy Consumption: Equipment like thermal oxidizers requires huge energy (and fuel) to burn off VOCs. Installing an RTO can cost millions of dollars. Operating costs then rise due to fuel or electricity use.
     

  • Maintenance and Downtime: Odour-control systems need frequent upkeep. For example, activated carbon filters saturate and must be replaced often. Wet scrubbers require fresh chemicals and create sludge waste. Each maintenance cycle means halting production to service the equipment.
     

  • Space Constraints: Older rubber factories often have no spare real estate. Large systems like biofilters or RTO stacks need room. Limited space can force companies to choose smaller (and less effective) units.
     

  • Corrosive Emissions: Rubber exhaust may contain acids or sulphur gases. These corrode metal ducts and fans over time. Unless using costly alloy materials, plants face equipment damage or leaks from corrosion.
     

  • Worker Health and Morale: Constant exposure to even low-level odours can cause headaches, nausea or eye irritation. This hurts worker productivity and can raise absenteeism and insurance claims.

Environmental, Community and Compliance Concerns

Foul smells impact more than just the plant interior:
 

  • Neighbourhood Complaints: Strong odours travel downwind. Neighbors may suffer headaches or discomfort, leading to formal complaints or legal action. History is full of cases where industrial odor led to lawsuits or forced closures.
     

  • Regulatory Pressure: In India, the CPCB (Central Pollution Control Board) and state boards enforce strict air quality rules. Globally, agencies like the EPA also regulate nuisance odors. One source notes that “strict environmental regulations require effective odour control measures”. Non-compliance can mean hefty fines or even shutdown orders.
     

  • Brand and Market Image: In today’s green-conscious market, a reputation for foul smells can lose customers. B2B clients (auto, machinery manufacturers) increasingly audit suppliers for environmental performance. A visibly “clean” factory (with no off-smells) is a competitive advantage.
     

  • Secondary Pollution Risk: Some odour remedies (like using bleach or acidic scrubbers) can create wastewater or residues. If mishandled, these can pollute soil or groundwater. Eco-friendly solutions avoid this by using biodegradable agents that don’t produce harmful waste.
     

Economically, unresolved odour can hit the bottom line via fines, shutdown risk, lost productivity, and higher insurance premiums (plants known for pollution pay more). It’s often cheaper to fix odors proactively than to pay penalties later.

Common Odour Control Technologies in Rubber Industry

Rubber facilities typically use a mix of control methods. Each has pros and cons:
 

  • Regenerative Thermal Oxidizers (RTOs): These burn off VOCs at ~800–900°C, converting most odorous compounds to CO₂ and H₂O. They can achieve very high removal (often 95–99%) because combustion destroys complex molecules. Pros: Extremely effective for large, solvent-rich streams. Cons: Very expensive to buy and run (fuel/energy). A European tire plant cited an RTO installation cost of ~€2M. (Most RTOs include heat exchangers to recover and reuse heat, which improves efficiency but adds cost.)
     

  • Wet Scrubbers: Exhaust air is bubbled through a liquid (often water with added reagents) to neutralize gases. For example, caustic soda (NaOH) can scrub sulfur and acid gases, while bleach solutions can oxidize organics. Pros: Good at capturing water-soluble and acidic odours (H₂S, NH₃). Cons: They often miss many VOCs, so organic smells can slip through. They also continuously consume chemicals and water, producing a spent-liquid waste that must be treated. Handling strong chemicals requires safety measures.
     

  • Activated Carbon Adsorbers: Air passes through a bed of activated carbon, which adsorbs organic vapors. Pros: Broadly effective on many solvents and gases. Cons: The carbon eventually gets “full” and must be replaced or thermally reactivated. Spent carbon (soaked with VOCs) can be flammable and often requires disposal as hazardous waste.
     

  • Biofilters: Odorous air is passed through a bed of organic media (wood chips, compost) coated with odor-eating microbes. The bacteria digest H₂S, ammonia and VOCs, converting them to carbon dioxide and water. Pros: Very low energy use (often just fans to move air); natural and biodegradable process. Can remove ~80–95% of H₂S and organics once established. Cons: Requires lots of land for the filter beds; performance depends on maintaining moisture and pH. They can take days or weeks to reach full efficiency after a startup.
     

  • Bio-enzymatic or Microbial Sprays: Special enzyme or bacterial preparations are sprayed onto odor sources (like waste piles or wastewater) to break down odor precursors. These are more preventive and work over time; they are seldom the sole solution for an exhaust stream. Pros: Safe and chemical-free. Cons: Not an instant fix in air; usually used alongside other controls.
     

  • Masking Agents: Essentially heavy fragrances or perfumed “smells” added to cover the odour. Pros: Cheap. Cons: Does not remove the pollutant – it only creates a new fragrance. This can sometimes make things worse (complaints may multiply when people sense multiple odors). We generally do not recommend masking as a long-term strategy.
     

  • Misting/Fogging Neutralizers (Plant-Based): This newer approach uses a fine mist of a special neutralizing liquid (often water-based and biodegradable) to capture odor molecules in the air. The mist droplets collide with and encapsulate odorous molecules, removing the smell. Pros: Equipment is compact (a few nozzles or a fog cannon) and can be added to existing ducts. Uses little power (just a pump or fan). Most importantly, if the mist is a natural product (like the plant-oil based OdoServe or similar), it adds no toxic chemicals. Cons: Misting must be sustained (droplets evaporate, so you need periodic or continuous spraying during high-odor operation). Also, in very large plants, multiple misting points may be needed to cover all vents.
     

Each system has trade-offs. For example, one plant in Europe chose portable carbon filters as a stopgap while planning an RTO – illustrating that hybrid or phased solutions are common.

Sustainable, Eco-Friendly Odour Neutralizers

The industry trend is moving toward green chemistry for odor control. Instead of hazardous reagents, many companies now use biodegradable, plant-derived formulations. For example, one odor neutralizer (Ecosorb®) uses plant oils to remove odors and is marketed as “non-toxic and safe,” “biodegradable” with no harmful VOC byproducts. In lab tests, this product reduced styrene vapor smells by ~98% within 20 minutes.
 

Similarly, Amalgam Biotech’s OdoServe is a plant-chemistry based compound designed to engulf odor molecules. Amalgam emphasizes that OdoServe is not a masking agent – rather, it literally surrounds and neutralizes the odor. As they explain, OdoServe is “non-toxic and safe to use,” and it “completely engulfs” odor molecules so that the smell vanishes.
 

Other suppliers also highlight safety and biodegradability. For example, one manufacturer notes that all their odor-control concentrates are “eco-friendly... fully biodegradable, non-hazardous, [with] zero PFOS/PFAS”. In short, these modern neutralizers eliminate odors without adding environmental hazards.
 

These biological/plant-based systems are often applied by fogging: they use an ultra-fine mist (25 microns or less) so the droplets have maximum surface area. A typical setup is a portable or fixed fogging unit that injects the mist into exhaust ducts, mixing rooms, or open lagoons. Operators usually just need basic PPE (masks and goggles) to avoid slipping hazards; the chemicals themselves are safe to handle.

How Misting Neutralizers Like OdoServe Work

  • Instead of filtering or burning the air, mist-neutralizers work by physical adsorption and chemical binding of odor molecules. Each tiny droplet of neutralizer solution collides with odor particles and traps them. The result is that the foul smell “vanishes” rather than being hidden.

  • For example, Amalgam Biotech describes OdoServe’s action as “engulfing” odors: “The OdoServe is a plant-chemistry based compound that engulfs the odour molecules completely,” they write. Once surrounded by the neutralizer droplet, the smelly molecule no longer reaches our noses. Crucially, the neutralizer doesn’t destroy the gas chemically; it renders it odorless.

  • Application Equipment: OdoServe and similar products are typically applied with cold-fogging machines (portable mist generators). The best practice is to use a very fine nozzle (25 microns or smaller) so that the mist covers as much air volume as possible. The supplier notes that smaller droplets have higher surface area and more effectively capture odor. The fogging units can be installed in ductwork or used as mobile sprayers in a room.

Implementing an Effective Odour Control Program

To solve odour issues in practice, factories should proceed methodically:

  1. Identify Sources: Use simple sniff tests or technical monitors to find the worst odour leaks. Focus first on the highest-emission processes (e.g. curing ovens, solvent tanks, wastewater pits).

  2. Capture at Source: Wherever possible, enclose equipment and vent it through ducts. Open lagoons or vents should be covered or scrubbed. Reducing fugitive emissions at the point of generation makes control easier.

  3. Ensure Proper Ventilation: Check that all foul-air streams go through a treatment system. Avoid missed leaks – even one open door or unconnected vent can undermine the whole system.

  4. Select Tailored Technologies: Don’t assume one method fits all. If sulfur smell is worst, consider scrubbing or a biological sulfur-eater. If solvent vapors dominate, focus on carbon or oxidation. If the odor mix is complex (thiols, amines, etc.), use a broad-spectrum neutralizer like a plant-based mist.

  5. Pilot and Optimize: Test chosen solutions on a small scale first. For example, use a portable fogger or small filter on one stack and measure the results. Tune reagent dosages, mist duration, fan speeds, etc., before committing.

  6. Monitor Continuously: Install odor and VOC sensors in vents or nearby ambient air. Track readings and complaints to verify performance. Adjust systems if odors start creeping back.

  7. Regular Maintenance: Schedule filter changes, scrubber cleanouts, and pump inspections. Clogged nozzles or spent media quickly reduce effectiveness. A little preventive maintenance goes a long way in keeping smells down.

  8. Engage with Stakeholders: Keep nearby communities, regulators, and workers informed of your odor control efforts. Showing that the plant is proactively fighting odours can build goodwill and avoid complaints. Posting emissions data or odor monitoring results is often helpful.

Real-World Tip: Many plants start with a mobile solution (e.g. a trucked-in scrubber or a rented fogger) to prove the concept. Once effectiveness is confirmed, they invest in a permanent installation. One case study noted exactly this approach: using portable carbon units on select vents before expanding treatment.

Finally, integrating these solutions with an overall sustainability plan pays off. For example, using a green neutralizing mist downstream of a scrubber can polish the output air to near-odorless with very little extra energy or waste. Training staff on handling safe neutralizers (which often require only simple PPE) means you don’t lose time on hazardous chemical safety. In the long run, investing in modern odour controls saves money – by avoiding fines, reducing health claims, and even cutting insurance costs.

FAQs on Rubber Industry Odour Control

Q: Why do rubber factories smell even after a scrubber or filter is installed?
A: Often one system is not enough. A wet scrubber might remove H₂S but leave organic solvent smells. A filter may catch some VOCs but not ammonia. If multiple odor-causing chemicals are present, you need multiple solutions. Unfixed leaks or overloaded units can also let odors bypass the system.

Q: Can natural odor neutralizers truly replace chemical scrubbers?
A: They can work with or instead of some scrubbers. For many compounds (mercaptans, thiols, etc.) a plant-based neutralizer can be more effective because it targets the molecule directly. These new products are lab-tested to remove >95% of certain VOCs. They do not introduce toxic chemicals, making them safer than some traditional scrubbers.

Q: Are these misting chemicals safe?
A: Yes. For instance, OdoServe is labeled “non-toxic and safe to use”. It biodegrades quickly. Workers typically need only light PPE (like a respirator for comfort), rather than full hazmat gear. By contrast, some older methods use corrosive or hazardous reagents.

Q: How does using OdoServe help with regulations?
A: Regulators care that you are controlling emissions, including odor, not how you do it. Using a proven technology like OdoServe shows due diligence. Many odor control products are tested in labs, so you can present data (e.g. X% odor reduction) to authorities to demonstrate compliance.

Q: What maintenance does a misting system need?
A: Very little. You simply refill the neutralizer solution when it runs low and ensure the nozzles/pumps are clean. There are no filters to replace. Typically, downtime is just a few minutes for refills. In contrast, carbon beds and scrubber media often need entire unit shutdowns to service.

Q: How do you handle persistent mercaptans or nitrosamines that cause odors?
A: These strong-smelling compounds often need specialized chemistry. Many generic scrubbers don’t fully remove them. A mist-neutralizer can be formulated (or is already formulated) to include plant compounds that chemically bond with sulfur compounds. In practice, we’ve seen misting effectively reduce mercaptan smells in rubber plants where scrubbers couldn’t.

Q: Do I need to fog round-the-clock?
A: Not usually. You can schedule fogging during peak odour production (e.g. when kilns are running) or use sensors to trigger it. Often a few hours after each batch is enough. Continuous 24/7 fogging is only needed if odor generation never stops. Even then, the volume of fog is low, so energy use is modest.

Q: Will misting chemicals contaminate wastewater or runoff?
A: Safe formulas like OdoServe are chosen to avoid that. Any mist that settles is biodegradable. We do recommend wiping or washing down equipment with water (normal cleaning) – the neutralizer residue will simply rinse away. It is much less of a concern than, say, washing off bleach or acid from scrubber maintenance.

Q: Which is better: an RTO or a biofilter?
A: Both have roles. An RTO is best if you have huge, continuous VOC loads and can afford the cost (it basically incinerates the pollutants). A biofilter is greener and cheaper to run, but needs space and is slower. Many plants use a mix: e.g. RTO on the largest solvent vent, and a biofilter for general stacks.

Q: How do I know what solution fits my plant?
A: First analyze your emissions (smell, chemical testing). Then match tech to pollutant. For mixed odors, plan a hybrid approach: capture with scrubbers/filters and then neutralize leftover odours. It’s wise to start small (test on one line) to gauge effectiveness. Vendors of neutralizers often assist with trials.

Conclusion

Managing odour in the rubber industry is challenging but possible with the right strategy. By combining source capture, effective technology, and eco-friendly practices, manufacturers can greatly reduce or eliminate foul smells. Modern plant-based neutralizers are a key part of this approach: they are “non-toxic and safe” while fully neutralizing odours (not just masking them). Lab tests show such products can cut VOC levels dramatically. When paired with proper ventilation and filtration, these green solutions help rubber plants stay compliant and keep neighbors happy. In the end, better odour control means healthier workers, fewer complaints, and a stronger brand image.
 

Sources: Credible industry and technical sources were used above, including research on rubber VOCs, industry odor-control case studies, and product literature on eco-friendly neutralizers. These references inform and validate the recommendations given here.

bottom of page